We are going to try to do NephJC twice a month. We feel the primary limiting factor will be high quality interesting articles to review. Though there is a value is reviewing low impact articles to pick apart what the authors did wrong, we feel that when we get the nephrology community together we should be reviewing important and meaningful articles that can make a difference.
We are actively seeking articles. Please submit possible candidates. If we pick your article we would like you to participate with the live discussion, though that is not required.